Ok after the finish in the Nationwide series at Gateway on Saturday night, here is my take....
Although what Carl did was unnecessary, it can be argued that both incidents this year he's had with Brad have looked much worse than they usually would've been (and therefore people have scorned Carl because of it). In the Atlanta crash, Brad happened to go airborne, and in this one he was t-boned in the pileup. I mean, that was a wicked hard hit Brad took by Shelby Howard on the final lap. Good thing he's ok.....like I said, I'm not saying what Carl did was right, but both crashes have happened to be bad, and therefore people have taken a strong stance against Edwards.
Kinda reminds me of Jamie Mac and Todd Bodine at Darlington in the Busch race in March 2003. Que Ball got loose trying to block Jamie, and spun both cars out, with Bodine coming out the victor. If not for the late race caution, the same exact thing would have happened. Again, I'm not saying what Carl or Todd did was right, fair, or good; I'm just saying that people sort of blow it out of proportion because the crash is bad.
On another note, the battle for the championship is starting to look rather exciting. Like Edwards in 2007, Keselowski could have a second-half "slump". I have a feeling Carl and Brad will be racing hard until the final lap at Homestead to win this thing!
I am a NASCAR fanatic, who follows other motorsports as well, such as Formula One and the Indy Car series. I just switched over from a different blogging site, wordpress.com....I've decided to start using this site because it's easier, and also because I'm hoping to make a lil' money on the side (please help me out by clicking on the ads on the side of the page! My favorite driver, by the way, is Jeff Gordon. Go #24!
Showing posts with label darlington. Show all posts
Showing posts with label darlington. Show all posts
Monday, July 19, 2010
Thursday, July 8, 2010
NASCAR Date Changes

Why is NASCAR considering all these stupid date/track changes???
Kansas is lobbying for a second date, which most likely would take a race away from California. Look, if Fontana's going back to one-race-a-year, they ought to give the date back to Rockingham, not give another to Kansas. Nothing personal against Kansas, the racing there isn't bad...but why must we have another cookie-cutter date? Same goes for Las Vegas.
In a perfect world, the schedule would look like this:
Racetracks losing a date:
1. Fontana
2. Texas
3. Loudon
Racetracks gaining a date (or a second one)
1. Rockingham
2. Darlington
3. Montreal
The road course Circuit Gilles Villeneuve in Montreal ought to be in the Chase, giving the champion more credibility. It would replace Texas in November. Rockingham would replace California in the Chase, and Darlington would replace Loudon in the Chase, as well.
The Chase would look like this:
1. Darlington
2. Dover
3. Kansas
4. Rockingham
5. Charlotte
6. Martinsville
7. Talladega
8. Montreal
9. Phoenix
10. Homestead
That way, there's a little of everything....high banked speedways, flat tracks, a short track, a plate track, cookie-cutters, and even a road course.
Labels:
california,
chase,
circuit gilles villeneuve,
cookie-cutter,
darlington,
date change,
kansas,
loudon,
montreal,
nascar,
road course,
rockingham,
short track,
sprint cup,
texas,
track
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)